Every time I say this in a room of farmers, I get suspicious looks. Sometimes I deserve them.
But here’s my position, and I’ll defend it: the conditions that feel like a tough market right now are also the conditions that make this one of the most interesting periods in Australian agriculture in a generation. Possibly the most interesting since the wool floor collapsed.
That’s not spin. Let me show you why.
The succession wave is about to break
I’ve written about this before, but it deserves more space. A very large proportion of Australian agricultural land is in the hands of people who are in their sixties, have built their operations over forty years, and don’t have a clean succession plan.
That land has to transfer. One way or another. And when large volumes of agricultural land transfer in a relatively compressed timeframe — whether through family succession, corporate acquisition, or sale to the next generation of owner-operators — it creates an enormous amount of activity. Data requirements. Legal requirements. Financial structuring requirements. Technology requirements.
The platforms that are sitting in the infrastructure layer of Australian agriculture when that wave breaks are going to see extraordinary demand. The ones that aren’t ready will miss it entirely.
We’re building to be ready for it.
Demographics and the new producer
The next generation of Australian producers is different from the previous one in ways that matter for technology adoption.
They grew up with smartphones. They’re comfortable making decisions based on data dashboards. They expect the tools they use for their farming operation to be as good as the tools they use for everything else. They don’t have patience for clunky interfaces or for data that’s three days old.
This cohort is smaller than the one that preceded it, but they’re going to be the most productive cohort of farmers Australia has ever had. Not because they’re smarter — the previous generation was extraordinary — but because the tools available to them are better, and they’ll actually use them.
The ag-tech sector has spent ten years building tools for a generation of producers who weren’t ready to adopt them. That readiness gap is closing fast.
The Australia-US corridor
This is the one I’m most excited about and probably talk about too much internally.
The United States and Australia share a lot of agricultural similarities — large-scale dryland farming, beef production systems, grain export orientation. But the data infrastructure, the market structures, and the tech ecosystems are different in ways that create genuine arbitrage opportunity.
Things that work in the US market can be adapted for Australia faster than building from scratch. Things that work in Australia — particularly around livestock data systems and some of our more sophisticated weather intelligence tools — have real application in the US where the infrastructure is, in some respects, less developed than you’d expect.
REALM Group America is in early stages, but the thesis is a two-way technology and market intelligence exchange across that corridor. The jobs page will give you a sense of where we’re building capacity.
Global food security is an Australian opportunity
I know this one sounds big-picture to the point of being useless for a producer trying to make margin this season. Bear with me.
The global food security conversation has been elevated permanently by the supply chain shocks of the last five years. Wars affecting grain-producing regions. Climate volatility disrupting production in ways that make the historical reliability of certain supply sources less bankable. Growing middle classes in Southeast Asia and other emerging markets demanding protein.
Australia is food-secure, geopolitically stable, and has a land base with significant further productive capacity. That’s not nothing. In a world where buyers are increasingly looking for reliable supply from trusted sources, Australian origin premiums are going to hold and possibly grow.
The producers who’ve invested in traceability infrastructure — who can prove the story of their product from paddock to port — are positioned to capture that premium. The ones who haven’t will increasingly compete on price alone, which is a race to the bottom.
Why I’m still building through a soft market
Here’s the honest founder view: building through a soft market is better than building through a peak market.
When everyone’s making money, nobody wants to change anything. The urgency to adopt new tools, to rethink systems, to invest in efficiency — it compresses in good times. The producers and traders who are open to doing things differently are disproportionately concentrated in periods of margin pressure.
That’s the window we’re building through. Not because I enjoy watching producers struggle — I don’t — but because the solutions we’re building are most relevant when the pressure is on.
And I think the pressure right now is making Australian agriculture stronger. The operations that survive and adapt will be more resilient than any version of this sector that just coasted on high commodity prices.
That’s worth being bullish about.
Come and track how this plays out with us — join the conversation at REALM360, or explore the data tools at realmgroup.global. We’ll keep building. You keep pushing.
— Robbie
